Crystal Palace 2 Spurs 1 – luck runs out

StambouliPalace

 

What marks this season out, is the lack of lack of consistency. One moment Spurs are beating the league leaders, the next they’re struggling against some of the lesser lights. I suppose this is what comes from transition.

Set on it’s own this defeat wasn’t so bad. We dominated possession and looked in control until a reckless challenge and a controversial refereeing decision energised a home side already desperate to impress their new boss. It was an unfortunate time to be facing Palace – there’s usually a honeymoon period for a new manager, made stronger when it’s the return of a prodigal son. The crowd and the players were fired up from the start.

In context, this was another lacklustre performance against a team towards the wrong end of the division, to set alongside Hull, Leicester and Burnley – this time Pochettino didn’t get away with it. After several fortunate wins, where Spurs have come back from a goal down to prevail 2-1, Alan Pardew turned the tables on the Argentine.

Missing the two stalwarts of the centre of his team, it was interesting to see who Pochettino would choose to deputise. With a surfeit of midfielders it is one of the curiosities of Spurs season that the team has come to rely on two youth team products who weren’t even in the conversation at the start of the year. The manager plumped for Dembele and Stambouli, hinting at who will be on their way out this transfer window.

The Belgian and the Frenchman have contrasting skill sets and weaknesses. Dembele languid, strong and skilful but lacking the dynamism Pochettino demands. Stambouli a blur of energy, diving in to tackles and racing round the pitch, with little regard for position or shape. The hope was they would compliment each other – would we end up with Dembele’s strength and skill and Stambouli’s energy, or perhaps the reverse?

Spurs began reasonably brightly and had the lion share of possession but chances were hard to come by. Both teams were to get one guilt edged opportunity in the first half. Neither took it.

Christian Eriksen failed to hook the ball home from six yards as Walker got behind the Palace defence. To be fair to him, the ball did come at him fast and slightly behind him.

Then Murray found himself free with only Lloris to beat. The Frenchman spread himself well to keep the score at 0-0. Rose was guilty of not tracking the forward’s run.

The second half began much brighter, with Harry Kane scoring his now customary goal. The flick that took the ball wide and made room for the shot, showed fantastic skill. Kane then threaded the ball through the defenders legs, past Speroni’s despairing dive.

The hard part done, it seemed Spurs would comfortably see out the match. That was until Stambouli’s moment of madness.

I’ve looked at the challenge many times, in slow motion and from several angles, and I still don’t know for sure if it was a penalty or not. My instinct is that it wasn’t and, if it was, it was certainly a soft one. But why slide challenge somebody in the area in that situation? Why give the referee the chance to make that decision?

The goal gave Palace renewed hope and from that point on they were on top. Soon after there was a shout for another penalty as Walker handled. He had his back turned to the ball, and it was outside the area anyway, but righteous indignation coursed through the Palace players. None more so than Punchoen who complained vociferously.

He was still buzzing when the chance fell to him to put Palace ahead. Eriksen lost the ball in a dangerous area. Zaha beat Walker all too easily. The ball broke to Puncheon and he gratefully blasted the ball into the Spurs net. Dembele and Capoue were far too slow to react and were never going to beat the fired up Palace man to the ball.

A late Kane shout for a penalty aside – which looked a good one – Tottenham laboured to create an equaliser. None was to come.

We mustn’t get too worked up over this result. Spurs have had a good run – a deal of fortune mixed in with some promising performances. The luck was always likely to turn at some point.

What it has done is highlight the limitations of our squad and some areas Pochettino needs to strengthen. There will be more ups and downs ahead but I still think we’re moving in the right direction.

Follow me on Twitter: @ABPSpurs

Were Spurs unlucky? Did we miss our regular midfield? Let me know your opinions in the comments below.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Crystal Palace 2 Spurs 1 – luck runs out

  1. Bingo

    Unlucky Spurs, lucky Palace. But Palace deserved it for persiistence and character. Spurs too slow to spot danger. Decision not to play Ben Davies backfired. Loss of Bentaleb and Mason is a real problem. Disappointed that Dembele reverted to type. He is a real talent who just can’t seem to ‘own’ matches the way he should do. Despite huge ability he’s not sharp enough with passing or spotting danger. Come on Moussa, sort it out!

    Reply
    1. AnythingButPenalties Post author

      Dembele has been useful this season when we have been struggling to hold onto the ball and under pressure. He adds that strength and composure. Here we needed some impetus and creativity and he failed. It’s a shame.

      Reply
  2. JOHN ADAM

    How right Greaves, a Spurs legend, was when he said that footbali is a funny old game. We see Spurs thrashing the mighty Chelsea and a week later, they succumb to lowly Crystal Palace, a match they should have won. I personally do not think they gave the best of themselves in that particular game. They did not appear to be hungry for a win as Palace did. After their 1-0 lead, they seemed to sit back out of complacency in that second half and became sluggish. They gave the ball away too easily and their defence weakened, thus conceding the second goal. In spite of the controversial penalty and the clear penalty not awarded to Kane, we have no excuse for losing that game. The players themselves are to blame. I cannot understand, for instance, why on earth Stambouli tackled the way he did in the penalty box when there was absolutely no goal threat. Wasn’t he aware of the risk he was taking? Such individual mistakes should be avoided if we want to win games…

    Reply
  3. Kevin

    You are right that we should not get too worked up about this defeat. As disappointing as it was, i thought it balanced out about previous game at WHL where we did not deserve to get a draw.

    Dembele continues to be such an enigma. It’s almost as if he is scared of going forward and there were so many times he could have released a pass. His success rate at dribbling was quite impressive but it is a complete mystery why he does not thread the ball forward more often.

    As for Stambouli, if he learns to control his recklessness, he might still prove to be useful to the team.

    Reply
  4. JOHN ADAM

    I think Davies should have played right from the start. He is better than Danny Rose. Townsend did not have a good match. He should have been substituted earlier. Soldado should also have come in much earlier to strengthen the attack since we needed at least one extra goal…

    Reply

What do you think? Please leave a comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s